No new governance model for GPs yet – Just what the doctor ordered?

No through road

It’s final – a majority of members of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) voted against the proposed modernisation of their 16-year old governance structure.

As the saying goes, in the end we only regret the chances we didn’t take – I sincerely hope this will not be one of them.

At yesterday’s RACGP member meeting 45.87 percent voted for, and 54.13 percent voted against the resolution. As a result the College will continue with its 13-member representative Council model.

The modernisation proposal was the result of a member-initiated governance review process that started 3 years ago. The proposed model would have introduced skills-based board positions and a representative council that would have better reflected the membership.

The two GP-led governance structures were set up to hold each other accountable. The model was designed to create a greater diversity of voices and thinking within the College.

But it wasn’t to be. Some of the arguments against the proposal were that the board of 7 members was too small, would contain non-GPs, and that the Board-Council model was wrong.

In the end RACGP members have decided and that needs to be respected. It looks like College records have been broken with regards to voter turnout which is always a good thing – and possibly the result of the technology which allowed members to participate in the online member meeting and vote from their digital devices anywhere in Australia.

I thought it was great to see so many GPs participating in the various discussions about governance and I’d like to thank everyone for their input.

The current model has served us well. It has allowed the RACGP to grow successfully over the past years – even though it has its flaws. At some stage the College engine will need replacement, but for now we’ll continue to drive with the old one. Time for reflection.

4 thoughts on “No new governance model for GPs yet – Just what the doctor ordered?

  1. Edwin congrats on your membership and the RACGP at least engaging in a timely public debate. It is so important for everyone to reflect and accommodate each other’s views. The fact there was voter turnout is awesome. In other professions they are paying the price. A refined process will get up one day it is important to publish what worked and what did not and what should happen next time if there was a next time.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. The vote was not a fail it was quite close. Things will change – just a bit more of a debate needs to happen. Look towards the screw ups in other professional bodies and it will succeed next time. There is a lot of merit with the correct governance controls for change to occur.


  3. Pingback: Members vote to reject new governance model • The Medical RepublicThe Medical Republic

  4. Pingback: RACGP vote turns down proposed restructure | FOAM4GP

I'd love to hear from you! Please leave a comment:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.